Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed March 15, 1938 :
Nelson, J.
The plaintiff considers itself aggrieved by the judgments of the circuit court which confirmed the orders of the commission which awarded compensation to the applicants, Heller and Zellmer, because- a contractual arrangement existed between the plaintiff and a partnership known as ‘.‘Granite Mens Company,” of which Heller and Zellmer wer.e members, which exempted the plaintiff from the provisions of the compensation act, and because, in any event, no compensable disability was shown to have been sustained by either Heller or Zellmer.,
*173Th…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Habrich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Nestle's Food Co. v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Scholz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Bach v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Heiliger v. City of SheldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Brewer v. MillichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.