Legal Opinion

Hume v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The facts are, in substance, as follows: On July 30, 1943, defendant Pelky fell from the roof of a barn, injuring himself. For several years prior to 1941 he had been employed by roofing companies. For about two years before the accident he had operated an oil station, also operated a small farm, and did some roofing work for friends. He put in full time at the filling station in the winter and part time in the summer, spending some time on the farm and part time on roofing jobs. Fie had one steady employee and in the summer had a young fellow working part time. Fie had four roofing jobs in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Madix v. Hochgreve Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Habrich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. St. Mary's Congregation v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Congleton v. Pura-Tex Stone Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Ebner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Plencner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API