Legal Opinion

Plencner v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

At the hearing before the Industrial Commission the parties confined their proof to the question of whether Frank Plencner was an employee of the city of Wautoma entitled to receive workmen’s compensation for an injury received while working on the city sewer system. A portion of the sewer system in the city of Wautoma became clogged by roots of trees growing into it. Moon, as street commissioner, was charged with the duty of keeping the streets and sewers in repair, and when he reported this sewer condition to the mayor and the sewer committee they told him “to go ahead and hire some men,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Huebner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hume v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Jasperson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Johnston v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. St. Mary's Congregation v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ebner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. United Way of Greater Milwaukee, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API