Legal Opinion

McLean v. Hyland Enterprises, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2001No. 00-184, 00-185, 00-186PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶1] These three consolidated appeals arise from related facts. Rob and Linda McLean, husband and wife, worked for Hyland Enterprises. In appeals No. 00-184 and No. 00-186, the Mcleans allege they both were wrongfully terminated from Hyland Enterprises in retaliation for Rob McLean's refusing to perform what he believed to be an unsafe order. They also allege they were terminated in violation of terms contained in the company's employee policy manual,. Hy-land Enterprises denies the claim of wrongful termination, alleges that the appropriate relief for such a claim is not a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. McBride v. Peak Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Plymale v. DonnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API