Legal Opinion

Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2003No. 02-124PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[T1] David and Kimberly Birt (the Birts) appeal from the district court's Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Because there are no genuine issues of material fact and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (Wells Fargo) is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.

ISSUES

[T2] The parties' separate renditions of the numerous issues raised in this appeal are lengthy and somewhat argumentative. Consequently, we will restate the issues as follows, all of which arise in summary judgment context:

1. Did the parties enter…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hatton v. Energy Electric Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County v. Healthcare Realty Trust Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API