Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Soulis
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1975No. 4458PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
A. J. Johnson brought this action in the district court against Nick Soulis and Catherine Soulis seeking relief in the form of rescission of a sale of an apartment house, damages for loss of income, and punitive damages, and asserting as grounds for such relief fraud and undue influence. A. J. Johnson and Nick Soulis were the active participants in the transaction, and Catherine Soulis appears as a party only because she was named as one of the grantees in the deed to the apartment house. The parties hereafter will be referred to simply as Johnson and Soulis.
In his Amended…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Maxted v. Pacific Car & Foundry CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Applied Genetics International, Inc. v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- England v. SimmonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.