Legal Opinion
Parkhurst v. Boykin
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 2004No. 03-193, 03-194PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Nina H. Parkhurst (Parkhurst) seeks review of an order of the district court that found that her son and daughter-in-law, Carl D. “Doug” Boykin and Debbie Boykin (the Boykins), were entitled to retain 100 bales of hay from Parkhurst’s ranch. Park-hurst also challenges the district court’s determination that the Boykins, as joint owners of a bank account with Parkhurst (who was the primary source of the deposits in the account), could withdraw all of the funds from that account without accounting to her or without a requirement that she be reimbursed for at least half…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Roth v. First Security Bank of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Comet Energy Services, LLC v. Powder River Oil & Gas Ventures LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Four B Properties, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Ranch 10, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company v. The Nature Conservancy, a District of Columbia non-profit corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.