Ward v. Cruse
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaRNhill, J.
The trial judge set aside the verdict in the exercise of her sound discretion. Her action in so doing is not reviewable. Riley v. Stone, 169 N.C. 421, 86 S.E. 348; Jones v. Insurance Co., 210 N.C. 559, 187 S.E. 769; S. v. Caper, 215 N.C. 670, 2 S.E. 2d 864.
The decisive question is this: Did the court below have authority to allow the motion to nonsuit and dismiss the action after the jury had rendered its verdict? This Court has consistently held to the negative view.
As stated, a trial judge may set aside a verdict in his discretion. He may set it aside as a matter of law for errors committed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Riley v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Akin v. First National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Bethea v. Town of KenlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Potter v. Carolina Water CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Temple v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Southeastern Fire Insurance Company v. WaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.