Legal Opinion

Riley v. . Stone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1915PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Bond, J., at June Term, 1915, of Chatham.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, 0. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of involuntary non-suit entered after verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The court entries made during the progress of the trial are; “At close of plaintiff’s testimony the defendant moves for judgment as of, nonsuit. Motion denied, and defendant excepts. ... At the close of all the testimony the defendant again renewed his motion to nonsuit the plaintiff, and repeats the same in respect to each of plaintiff’s several causes of .action. The court overruled each of the motions, and the defendant excepted to the order of the court in each instance.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Parker v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Stith v. . LookabillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Strause v. Sawyer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Butler v. Holt-Williamson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API