Bethea v. Town of Kenly
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s appeal. “It is a cardinal rule that the judgment must follow the verdict, and if the jury have given a specified sum as damages, the court cannot increase or diminish the amount, except to add interest, where is is allowed by law and has not been included in the findings of the jury.” 2 McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure § 1691 (2d ed. 1956); Durham v. Davis, 171 N.C. 305, 88 S.E. 433. In this case, the judge should have set aside the verdict in his discretion if he deemed it against the weight of the evidence or considered the damages excessive. Instead of doing so,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McLaurin v. . CronlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- City of Durham v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Temple v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Ward v. CruseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Starnes v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Lazenby v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Industrial Circuits Co. v. Terminal Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF CITY OF DURHAM v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.