Legal Opinion

Nowell v. Basnight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1923PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalkeb, J.

The plaintiffs, L. A. Nowell and J. H. Allen, during tbe year 1918, were partners in trade, buying leaf tobacco of farmers in Bertie and Hertford counties. This action is brought to recover of defendants the value of certain tobacco raised on the Bass land, and the Phelps tobacco, belonging to plaintiffs, as they allege.

Q. A. Bass owned a farm in Bertie County, and leased his son, J. A. Bass, ten acres of the land to be planted in tobacco. Under their arrangement the elder Bass, as landlord, was to receive half of the crop when prepared for market, and the other half belonged to the son. The…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Purnell v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Mercer v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Wood v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Beck v. HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Beck v. . HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API