Legal Opinion

Akin v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1947PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

When a verdict is set aside for error or errors in law, committed during the trial, and not as a matter of discretion, the party thereby aggrieved may appeal, provided the error or errors are specifically designated. Powers v. Wilmington, 177 N. C., 361, 99 S. E., 102; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32; Smith v. Winston-Salem, 189 N. C., 178, 126 S. E., 514. See, Likas v. Lackey, 186 N. C., 398, 119 S. E., 763; Godfrey v. Queen City Coach Co., 200 N. C., 41, 156 S. E., 139. Here, the error which induced the court’s action is stated as the failure to direct a verdict for the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Sykes v. Boone.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Lefkowitz v. . SilverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Matter of Will of MaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. In Re the Will of HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API