Boyd v. Devane
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. All parties to the case who are interested in sustaining the judgment of the trial court are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court, and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions, or the writ of error will be subject to dismissal. Code, § 6-1202; Emanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552 (168 S.E. 316); Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga. 776 (113 S.E. 190); Teasley v. Cordell, 153 Ga. 397 (112 S.E. 287).
2. An order or judgment of the trial judge, entered upon an amendment praying that named persons be made parties plaintiff along with the original plaintiff and that the amendment be allowed,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Teasley v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Stanfield v. Downing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brunswick Peninsular Corporation v. DaughartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Owens v. MackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Whiteman v. LedfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948