Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Downing Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1938No. 12344PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

A suit on open account was instituted against D. L. Stanfield, alleged to be guardian of Marshall D. Hursey. In the petition it was alleged that the defendant “as guardian of the said” ward “is indebted to petitioner” in a named sum “for board and nursing” of the ward, which “is now due to your petitioner by the said D. L. Stanfield, guardian.” The defendant’s answer admitted that he was the duly qualified guardian of the ward, and joined issue on all other material allegations. In the answer it was alleged that the defendant had in hand a stated sum of money…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jennings v. William W. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Wadley v. OertelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Empire State Chemical Co. v. ShubrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Humphrey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Tyler v. LangworthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clark v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. MacH v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Jackson v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Bentley v. StillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API