Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 17, 1934No. 24340PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
I. Failure to make one a party to tile bill of exceptions, who is interested in sustaining the judgment excepted to, and to serve such person with a copy thereof, will result in a dismissal of the writ of error. U. S. Leather Co. v. First National Bank, 107 Ga. 263 (33 S. E. 31) ; Inman v. Estes, 104 Ga. 645 (30 S. E. 800) , and cit.; Moore v. NeSmith Lumber Co., 18 Ga. App. 225 (89 S. E. 169) ; Swafford v. Shirley, 7 Ga. App. 347 (66 S. E. 1022) ; Davis v. Walters, 140 Ga. 229, 231 (78 S. E. 838).
2. All parties interested in sustaining or reversing the judgment of the court below are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Malsby v. ShippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Huey v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Howard v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Boyd v. DevaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Westbrook v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Darby v. City of VidaliaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.