Legal Opinion

Owens v. Mack

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1948No. 16311Published

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of exceptions names I. S. Mack, as administrator of Fannie Valentine Owens, as the only defendant in error. One of the defendants named in the petition, Fannie Valentine Dickens (for whom service of the petition was acknowledged by counsel), is not named as defendant in error, nor was service of the bill of exceptions perfected on her. The interest of Fannie Valentine Dickens, as a claimant to the property, is antagonistic to the claim of Carrie Bell Johnson Owens, the plaintiff in error. Manifestly Fannie Valentine Dickens would be interested in having the judgment of the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Huey v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Kirkpatrick v. FawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Howard v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Boyd v. DevaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API