Legal Opinion
Emanuel Farm Co. v. Batts
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 22, 1933No. 9072PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. All parties who are interested in sustaining the judgment of the court below, or who would be affected by a judgment of reversal, are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions, or the writ of error will be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 6176; Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga. 776 (113 S. E. 190).
2. Where a suit against the grantor and a remote grantee (a corporation), to cancel a deed, was filed in the county of the residence of the grantor, ■and such grantee, whose residence was in a different county, filed a plea to the jurisdiction, alleging…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Teasley v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Turner v. NewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Anderson v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Malsby v. ShippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Lanier v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Poston v. Durham & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.