Legal Opinion

Brunswick Peninsular Corporation v. Daugharty

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1949No. 16488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) I. Daugharty and G. R. Daugharty made a motion in the Supreme Court to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that A. S.- Mitchell and Minnie S. Mitchell, parties plaintiff in the trial court, were not named or served as parties defendant in error in the bill of exceptions.

All persons who are interested in sustaining the judgment excepted to are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court, and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions, or the writ of error will be subject to dismissal. Code, § 6-1202; Hancock v. Lizella…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hancock v. Lizella Fruit FarmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Boyd v. DevaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. JewelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API