Gasser v. Wall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal, reported in 111 Minn. 6, 126 N. W. 284, the case was tried before Cant, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $918.62. Erom an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or ¿for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was before the court on a former appeal, where a new-trial was granted. 111 Minn. 6, 126 N. W. 284. A second trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
The questions presented on the present appeal differ in some respects from those before us on the former appeal, a proper understanding of which requires a restatement of the case. The jury ivere justified in finding the following facts:
The law firm of Baldwin, Baldwin & Dancer, of Duluth, oAvned or controlled ten thousand shares of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yale Gas Stove Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Church v. OdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Hambleton v. RhindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Seehorn v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Bailey v. Grand Forks Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klaman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Mannheimer v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Graffam v. LynottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Old Colony Life Insurance v. American Sayings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926