Hambleton v. Rhind
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Dennis, J.), passed in the case of the Baltimore Trust and Guarantee Company, agent of two syndicates, against T. Edward Hambleton and others, by which it was held that the defendant, Colden Rhind, was absolutely entitled to the entire fund brought into Court by the complainant free from all claims of other parties.
1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.
There are ten appeals now before us in a single record, but only one opinion will be required to cover them all; because, whilst there are some slight variations in minor details, the material facts in all the cases are identical and precisely the same legal principles are applicable to them.
Sometime in the early fall of eighteen hundred and ninety-two the appellee, Colden Rhind, a resident of the State of Georgia, obtained authority from the Governor and Treasurer of South Carolina to float for that State, upon certain stipulated terms, an issue of about six millions of her four per cent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Maryland Railroad v. Franklin BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Andrews v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Baltimore Coal Tar & Manufacturing Co. v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
3Cited by23 opinions
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Kislak v. KreedianSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Herring v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.