Seehorn v. Hall
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jaclcson Circuit Court. — Hon. John W. Henry, Judge. (1) The court erred in its rulings on the instructions. (2) Money claimed to have been received on partnership account by one partner can not be recovered- by the other partners in an action at law. Springer v. Cobell, 10 Mo. 641; Smith v. Smith, 33 Mo. 557; Rtissell v. Given, 46 Mo. 411; Bonds v. Beemis, 55 Mo. 524. (1) Plaintiffs are entitled to recover on the facts stated in the petition.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jaclcson Circuit Court. — Hon. John W. Henry, Judge. (1) The court erred in its rulings on the instructions. (2) Money claimed to have been received on partnership account by one partner can not be recovered- by the other partners in an action at law. Springer v. Cobell, 10 Mo. 641; Smith v. Smith, 33 Mo. 557; Rtissell v. Given, 46 Mo. 411; Bonds v. Beemis, 55 Mo. 524. (1) Plaintiffs are entitled to recover on the facts stated in the petition. Land Go. v. Case, 104 Mo. 572; Tale. Gas Stove Go. v. Wilcox (1894), 29 Atl. Rep. (Conn.) 303; Ferguson v. Bateman, 1 App. Cases, Dist.…
1Opinion of the CourtMaceablane, J.
Plaintiff Seehorn as administrator of P..T. Scruggs and Mortimer Deering prosecutes this suit against William A. Hall and Nathan J. Hall, the object of which is to recover one half of a commission received by defendants for effecting a sale of a cattle ranch in the state of Colorado.
The petition charged, and the evidence tended to prove, in substance, the following facts: Defendants were engaged as partners in the cattle business in Kansas City. One James Wilcox lived in Trinidad, Colorado, and was the owner of a cattle ranch, consisting of land and cattle, which was located about thirty…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Yale Gas Stove Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Curry v. LafonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Clark & Barker v. Eufaula Brick WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.