Graffam v. Lynott
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Some of the facts appear in Sorenson v. Greysolon Co. supra, page 259. A recovery was sought in the case at bar on the theory that plaintiffs and defendant had agreed that defendant should purchase certain lots in Duluth at a price and on terms as favorable as possible; that plaintiffs should furnish a portion of the purchase price and have an interest in the lots; that defendant had made a contract with the agents of the owner of the lots for the purchase thereof at a price of $48,500; that he falsely represented that he had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Venie v. Harriet State Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Gasser v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Mannheimer v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Gasser v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tate v. BallardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Barrett v. ShambeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932