Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Grand Forks Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1909No. Nos. 15,816—(83)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action in the district court for Polk county by John Bailey to recover $15,000 damages for personal injuries sustained by his minor son while employed by defendant. The case was tried before Watts, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $7,-500. From an order denying its motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

Barney Bailey, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, a minor seventeen years old, was on July 9, 1907, injured while working- for the defendant in its sawmill at East Grand Forks by his foot coming in contact with a saw. His father brought this action in the district court of the county of Polk to recover damages for the benefit of the son on account of such injury. Verdict for $7,500. The defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

*193The assignments of error raise two general questions.

The first one is: Did the trial court err in denying the defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. BurtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Ellington v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. State v. ZempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. McCarvel v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Mobile Fruit & Trading Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sassen v. HaegleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Rimmer v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Klaman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Snyder v. Waldorf Box Board Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Farris v. KoplauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API