Legal Opinion
Klaman v. Hitchcock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1930No. 28,020PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Appeal by defendants from an order denying their • alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
Plaintiff brings the action to recover damages for personal injury. Defendants are the proprietors of and operate a moving picture theater in Minneapolis. On the evening of November 7, 1928, the plaintiff paid for admission to and attended a picture show in the theater. During the performance and while sitting in her seat on the main floor of the theater she ivas struck on the head and injured by a wooden chair seat which fell or was precipitated from the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Mastad v. BrethrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State v. SailorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Frye v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Priewe v. BartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Loren Zutz Deb Zutz Ron Zutz, Doing Business as Zutz Farms, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Case Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Greenberg v. HolfeltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.