Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Radcliffe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1954No. 13726_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRIVER, District Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order, based upon findings that respondents C. W. Radcliffe and W. W. Mancke, co-partners doing business as Homedale Tractor & Equipment Company, engaged in unfair labor practices. Specifically, the Board’s findings are that respondents interfered with union organizational activities of its employees by the strategically timed announcement of a profit-sharing plan, interrogated an employee regarding his and other employees’ union sympathies, and threatened to close their establishment, if it were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Condenser Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shattuck Denn Mining Corporation, (Iron King Branch) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ayer Lar SanitariumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gotham Industries, Inc., and Crawford Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Eastern Greyhound Lines, (A Division of the Greyhound Corporation) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.