Legal Opinion
Shattuck Denn Mining Corporation, (Iron King Branch) v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1966No. 20131PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board adopted the findings of its trial examiner and held that petitioner (Shat-tuck) had violated sections 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) 1 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1) and (3)). Shattuck seeks to set the Board’s order aside; the Board seeks enforcement. The sole question presented is whether “[t]he findings of the Board * * * [are] supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole * * (Section 10(e), 29 U.S. C. § 160(e)). If so, those findings are “conclusive.” We hold that the findings are…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Globe Wireless, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wright Line, a Division of Wright Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Gottfried v. FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Adco Electric IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Grinding Wheel Co., Inc., and International Chemical Workers Union, Local 614, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.