National Labor Relations Board v. Condenser Corp. of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
In this proceeding by the Labor Board against the above named parties, the Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation (referred to hereafter as Cornell) disclaims liability on the ground that it is not an employer within the meaning of § 2(2) of the Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 152(2). It argues, therefore, that it is not responsible for the unfair labor practices charged. The relationship of Cornell to the other corporate respondent, the Condenser Corporation, and the former’s interest in the latter, cannot fairly be described, as the respondents seek to characterize…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- International Union, U. A. W. A., A. F. of L., Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 1229, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.