Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 5, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 20583PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCREE, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on motion by plaintiff for production of documents under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The action arises from a collision between an automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger and a train operated by defendant railroad. In response to interrogatories, defendant’s attorney indicated that written statements had been taken from five named members of the train crew. Plaintiff seeks to have these statements produced.

An affidavit by plaintiff’s counsel states that his client is unable to recall the *149-facts and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Martin v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Brown v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Carman v. FishelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. State Farm Insurance Company v. RobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jackson v. Kroblin Refrigerated Xpress, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API