Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge Lanham
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of a contempt citation and $2,000 fine levied against Appellant Southern Railway Company for refusing to comply with the district court’s order requiring it to produce certain documents under Rule 34 of the Fed eral Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellees, plaintiffs below, instituted this suit, alleging negligent homicide of three members of their family who were fatally injured when the car in which they were riding collided with one of Southern’s trains on May 4, 1965. Southern’s Claim Department conducted its own investigation of the accident…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Veronica Lewis, Individually Etc., Naomi Barry Pottinger, Individually, Etc., Vincent Lewis, Daisy Llewellyn, and Margaret Clark, Individually, Etc. v. S. S. Baune, in the Matter of Skibs A/s Baumare and Torvald Klaveness, as Owner Andmanaging Owner of the S/s Baune, Petitioning for Exoneration From or Limitationof Liability v. Phyllis Hoyt, Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.