Legal Opinion

Stanback v. Stanback

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1975No. 18PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

In her first assignment defendant wife alleges the Court of Appeals erred in allowing an immediate appeal from the four interlocutory orders of the trial court.

Ordinarily, an appeal from an interlocutory order will be dismissed as fragmentary and premature unless the order affects some substantial right and will work injury to appellant if not corrected before appeal from final judgment. Currin v. Smith, 270 N.C. 108, 153 S.E. 2d 821 (1967) ; Steele v. Hauling Co., 260 N.C. 486, 133 S.E. 2d 197 (1963) ; see 2 McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure § 1782 (1956) ;…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Guilford National Bank v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Block v. County of PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API