Legal Opinion
Brown v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1955PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to inspect and copy certain documents pursuant to Rule 34, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries incurred when plaintiff, on leaving defendant’s train, fell into the space between the car and the station platform.
Plaintiff seeks to inspect and copy statements obtained by defendant’s employees, from himself and other witnesses; reports made by defendant's employees; and a report made by defendant’s physician of an examination of plaintiff subsequent to the accident, but prior to the commencement of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hayman v. Pullman Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Thompson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Szymanski v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Rosenblum v. DingfelderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- American Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Guilford National Bank v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Frederick Z. Goosman, to His Own Use and to the Use of Royal Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.