Legal Opinion

Martin v. Capital Transit Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 18, 1948No. 9505PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This is a special appeal from an order of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia denying a motion under Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for the production of a written report. Rule 34 as phrased at the time of the order provided, so far as here pertinent:

Upon motion of any party showing good cause therefor and upon notice to all other parties, the court in which an action is pending may (1) order any party to produce and permit the inspection and copying or photographing, by or on behalf of the moving party, of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
  3. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  4. American Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Guilford National Bank v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API