Legal Opinion

State Farm Insurance Company v. Roberts

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1965No. 8001PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice,

This is an appeal by the State Farm Insurance Company from an order of the Superior Court holding such company in civil and criminal contempt for failure to produce a statement of its insured, defendant below. Plaintiffs and defendant will be I referred to herein as they appeared in the lower courty, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company will be designated as State Farm.

The issues before us arose out of an automobile accident in which the defendant allegedly ran into the rear- of plaintiffs’ vehicle. Four days later defendant’s written statement was taken by James…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Boeing Airplane Company v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board v. Boeing Airplane Company, Boeing Airplane Company, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Dean v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. United States of America for the Use of Weston & Brooker Company, a Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. Schwartz v. Broadcast Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Henderson v. Zurn Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
  3. City of Phoenix v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Bryan v. RiddelArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hawes Firearms Co. v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API