Legal Opinion

Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2000No. S064870PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.—

We are asked to decide whether, in an action that is not certified as a class action, but is brought on behalf of absent persons by a private party under the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.),1 the court may order disgorgement into a fluid recovery fund, and whether permitting such UCL action denies due process to the defendants. We also address a claim that the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the trial court’s construction and application of Civil Code section 1950.5 in this case.

We conclude that disgorgement into a fluid recovery fund is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API