Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.—
We are asked to decide whether, in an action that is not certified as a class action, but is brought on behalf of absent persons by a private party under the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.),1 the court may order disgorgement into a fluid recovery fund, and whether permitting such UCL action denies due process to the defendants. We also address a claim that the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the trial court’s construction and application of Civil Code section 1950.5 in this case.
We conclude that disgorgement into a fluid recovery fund is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.