Haiduven v. Cooper
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The judgment filed against defendant on 10 September 1973 is not before us for review. No appeal was taken from that judgment, and “an appeal from an order denying relief under Rule 60(b) does not bring up for review the judgment from which relief is sought.” 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 60.30 [1]. Thus, the only question presented by this appeal is the validity of the court’s ruling made in the order appealed from, dated 18 March 1974, which denied defendant’s motion for relief under Rule 60 (b) (1).
In order to grant a motion under Rule 60(b)(1) to relieve a party from a final…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hanford v. McSwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Holcomb v. . HolcombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Sutherland v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Doxol Gas of Angier, Inc. v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Sutherland v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A.R. Haire, Inc. v. St. DenisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Patrick v. RONALD WILLIAMS, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Allen v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Harris v. Family Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- City of Salisbury v. KIRK RLTY. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.