A.R. Haire, Inc. v. St. Denis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
To establish in personam jurisdiction over non-resident defendants, there must be “certain minimum contacts [between the nonresident defendant and the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’ ” Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Indus. Corp., 318 N.C. 361, 365, 348 S.E.2d 782, 786 (1986) (citations omitted). Plaintiff argues that Defendants’ telephone calls, negotiations, and document exchange of a proposed contract are sufficient to establish the required “minimum contacts” required by due process. As we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Universal Leather, LLC v. KORO AR, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Scholl v. Sagon RV Supercenter, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Dailey v. PopmaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Rossetto USA, Inc. v. Greensky Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Marx Industries, Inc. v. Chestnut Ridge Foam, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.