Legal Opinion

Hanford v. McSwain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1949PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNborNE, J.

The decisions of this Court uniformly hold that a party, moving in apt time under the provisions of G.S. 1-220, to set aside a judgment taken against him, on the ground of excusable neglect, not only must show excusable neglect, but also must make it appear that he has a meritorious defense to the plaintiff’s cause of action. Dunn v. Jones, 195 N.C. 354, 142 S.E. 320; Hooks v. Neighbors, 211 N.C. 382, 190 S.E. 224; Johnson, v. Sidbury, 225 N.C. 208, 34 S.E. 2d 67; Craver v. Spaugh, 226 N.C. 450, 38 S.E. 2d 525; Whitaker v. Raines, 226 N.C. 526, 39 S.E. 2d 266, and numerous other cases.

The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Dishman v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Culbreth v. Britt Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API