Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. . Holcomb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1926PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

This is an appeal from a refusal to set 'aside a judgment by default final on the ground of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” under C. S., 600. The judge, not being requested to do so, found no facts upon which he based his ruling. Carter v. Rountree, 109 N. C., 29. In the absence of such finding, it is presumed that the judge, upon proper evidence, found facts sufficient to support his judgment. McLeod v. Gooch, 162 N. C., 122. Hence, there is nothing for us to review. Osborn v. Leach, 133 N. C., 428. “We do not consider affidavits for the purpose of finding facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. McLeod v. . GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Coharie Lumber Co. v. BuhmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Barringer v. FORSYTH COUNTY WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CTRCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. . DaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API