Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. McLean

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 10, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

Tbe case presents a single proposition of law, to wit: What duty does tbe law impose upon a defendant in a civil action witb reference to tbe preparation and trial of bis cause?

There are a host of decisions in this State upon tbe subject, and many of them are totally irreconcilable. However, it is fairly clear that two imperative duties are imposed upon a defendant in a civil action: First, be must give to tbe litigation such attention “as a man of ordinary prudence usually bestows upon bis important business.” This principle is announced in many cases, of wbicb tbe following are…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Pepper v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Griel v. . VernonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  5. Albertson v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Johnson v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Wellons v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Carter v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Haiduven v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API