Sutherland v. McLean
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.
Tbe case presents a single proposition of law, to wit: What duty does tbe law impose upon a defendant in a civil action witb reference to tbe preparation and trial of bis cause?
There are a host of decisions in this State upon tbe subject, and many of them are totally irreconcilable. However, it is fairly clear that two imperative duties are imposed upon a defendant in a civil action: First, be must give to tbe litigation such attention “as a man of ordinary prudence usually bestows upon bis important business.” This principle is announced in many cases, of wbicb tbe following are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Pepper v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Griel v. . VernonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- Albertson v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Johnson v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Wellons v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Carter v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Haiduven v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.