Legal Opinion

City of Salisbury v. KIRK RLTY. CO., INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 1980No. 8019SC70PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Because the judgment of 2 May 1979 was entered by the Clerk before the expiration of the statutory period of 20 days allowed for the filing of exceptions, it is an irregular judgment, Collins v. Highway Commission, 237 N.C. 277, 74 S.E. 2d 709 (1953), but stands as the j udgment of the court until set aside by a proper proceeding therefor.

To set aside a judgment for irregularity, it is necessary to make a motion in the cause before the court which rendered the judgment, with notice to the other party. The objection cannot be made by appeal, or an independent action, or by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Haiduven v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. A.R. Haire, Inc. v. St. DenisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. J. M. Thompson Co. v. Doral Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Dailey v. PopmaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Brown v. Cavit Sciences, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Rossetto USA, Inc. v. Greensky Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API