Legal Opinion

Kenneth F. Sullivan Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The first and most crucial issue presented on this appeal is whether the respondents left or lost their employment because of a strike or other bona fide labor dispute in active progress at the establishment where they were last employed.

Employees are generally entitled to compensation for the time that they are unemployed. Sullivan’s employees, the respondents, were laid off because of a lack of cement at the project sites. This lack of concrete, in turn, was caused by a strike of the supplier’s truck drivers. The precise question is whether workers, who become unemployed due to a material…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Spielmann v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Rice Lake Creamery Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Fredricks v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. A. J. Sweet of La Crosse, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brauneis v. State, Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cook v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Kansas City Star Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jenks v. Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. Appleton Electric Co. v. MinorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API