Legal Opinion

Spielmann v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1940No. 104; 103; 105PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendant Nash-Kelvinator Corporation is engaged in a variety of manufactures, among them the manufacture of Nash automobiles. It owns plants at Milwaukee, Racine, and Kenosha. The plaintiff Spielmann was employed in the Milwaukee plant, plaintiffs Hamkins and Milkent in the Kenosha plant. All three plaintiffs lost employment by reason of the shutting down of the plants in which they were respectively engaged. They applied to the Industrial Commission for unemployment compensation under ch. 108, Stats. The Spielmann case will b.e first considered.

The act provides for payment to the state…

2Cited by44 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. General Motors Corporation v. MulquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API