Legal Opinion

A. J. Sweet of La Crosse, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1962PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Sec. 108.04 (10), Stats., of the Wisconsin Unemployment Compensation Act, provides:

“Labor dispute. An employee who has left (or partially or totally lost) his employment with an employing unit because of a strike or other bona fide labor dispute shall not be eligible for benefits from such (or any previous) employer’s account for any week in which such strike or other bona fide labor dispute is in active progress in the establishment in which he is or was employed.” (Italics supplied.)

The statutory words “other bona fide labor dispute” are broad enough to embrace those which culminate in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. v. Howard Brass & Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Streeter v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Liberty Trucking Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Martel v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Brauneis v. State, Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. De Leeuw v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API