Legal Opinion
San Pablo Bay Pipeline Co. LLC v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 2013No. F064501PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Subsidiaries of Shell Petroleum Inc. that own and operate a crude oil pipeline filed this original writ proceeding to challenge a decision by California’s Public Utilities Commission (the Commission or PUC) concerning the refund of a portion of the fees the subsidiaries collected from Chevron, Tesoro and Valero for transporting oil through the pipeline. The issue before this court is whether the Commission erroneously included privately owned truck racks and storage tanks in the pipeline assets subject to regulation as a public utility.
We conclude the Commission properly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Stewart Title Co. v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Brawley v. J.C. Interiors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Pablo Bay Pipeline Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ponderosa Tel. Co. v. Cal. Pub. Utilities Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Calaveras Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. CAPUCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019