Legal Opinion

Calaveras Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 2023No. F083339Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 12/20/22; Modified and Certified for Partial Pub. 1/18/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., F083339 Petitioners, (Dec. Nos. 21-04-005 & 21-08-042) v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent; PUBLIC ADVOCATES OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION et al., Real Parties in Interest. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of review. BRB Law, Patrick M. Rosvall and Sarah J. Banola for Petitioners. Arocles Aguilar, Mary McKenzie and Tovah Trimming for Respondent. Lozeau Drury, Michael R. Lozeau;…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API