Legal Opinion

Ponderosa Tel. Co. v. Cal. Pub. Utilities Comm'n

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 18, 2019No. F076845PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnauffer, J.

*1002In this original proceeding, three rural telephone companies, The Ponderosa Telephone Co., Sierra Telephone Company, Inc., and Volcano Telephone Company (together petitioners), challenge the decision of the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) establishing petitioners' "cost of capital," which is a financial yardstick used by the PUC as a component in *1003ratemaking.1 Conceptually, a utility company's cost of capital, also referred to as a rate of return, reflects that company's cost of generating or obtaining capital for investment in assets (e.g., facilities, equipment or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Calaveras Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. City and County of S.F. v. Public Utilities Com.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Securus Technologies v. Public Utilities Com.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API