Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2000No. B137693PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
Petitioner Southern California Edison Company (SCE) sought a writ of review of Public Utilities Commission (PUC or Commission) Decision No. 99-11-057 and Resolution E-3606, both denying SCE the ability to establish a “memorandum account” effective January 1, 1999. We issued the writ. SCE urges the PUC abused its discretion and failed to proceed in the manner required by law insofar as it failed to recognize the memorandum account came into existence by operation of law on January 1, 1999. We agree.
SCE filed with the PUC an advice letter, attaching a tariff, which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Stolman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Young v. Horizon West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Developmental Services Alternatives, Inc. v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.