Legal Opinion
Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. CAPUC
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2019No. F076845Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 6/18/19; pub. order 6/28/19 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO., et al., F076845 Petitioners, (CPUC Decision Nos. 16-12-035 & v. 17-12-029) CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, OPINION Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of review. Cooper, White & Cooper, Mark P. Schreiber, Patrick M. Rosvall, Sarah J. Banola, and Priya D. Brandes, for Petitioners. Arocles Aguilar, Helen W. Yee, and Eleanor M.W. Youngsmith for Respondent. -ooOoo- In this original proceeding, three rural telephone…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.