Legal Opinion
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1968No. S. F. 22561PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Petitioner Greyhound Lines, Inc. seeks review of Decision No. 72297 of the Public Utilities Commission which compels extension of commuter bus service over routes in the San Francisco Bay Area. Greyhound is a pas senger stage corporation, as defined in Public Utilities Code section 226, 2 operating buses transporting passengers, baggage, and express pursuant to a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under section 1031.
The commission ordered that Greyhound extend its passenger stage service over routes in San Mateo County on Skyline Boulevard between a point in Daly City and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Southern California Edison Co. v. PeeveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- PG&E Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Toward Utility Rate Normalization v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- City & County of San Francisco v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.