Legal Opinion

Fala Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 28, 2002No. 98-337LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*91 Order on Motion for Entry of a Voluntary Dismissal

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This takings action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for entry of a voluntary dismissal filed April 1, 2002. After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions and after oral argument, the Court hereby grants plaintiffs’ motion and dismisses the case with prejudice.

DISCUSSION

U.S. Court of Federal Claims Rule (RCFC) 41(a) governs the dismissal of actions. The rule provides:(a) Voluntary Dismissal; Effect Thereof. (1) By Plaintiff; by Stipulation____ [A]n action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  2. Schweiger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Deuterium Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. City of Virginia Beach v. Nala Corp.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Freeman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. In Re Downstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. In Re Downstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Lodge Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API